The 1.5°C Target Is Still Alive, But Only If We Treat It as a Deadline
The 1.5°C goal isn't dead—current policies give 2.8°C, but record emissions and a narrow path demand we treat it as an emergency. Here's my plan.
Climate agreements, EPA, and environmental policy.
The 1.5°C goal isn't dead—current policies give 2.8°C, but record emissions and a narrow path demand we treat it as an emergency. Here's my plan.
From EPA to COP29, environmental rules are shifting fast. Here's how to stay compliant and ahead of the curve with practical steps.
As a policy practitioner, I argue carbon pricing is the most underused tool in climate action. Here's how to apply it using real numbers from the late...
Current national climate pledges fall far short. To limit warming to 1.5°C, emissions must drop 43% by 2030. But we're on track for 2.8°C. Here's the ...
Blunt answers to your most pressing questions about environmental regulation updates, from the Clean Air Act to the Paris Agreement, and what they mea...
The Paris Agreement's voluntary approach is failing. We need binding targets, stronger enforcement, and a global carbon price to drive real emissions ...
Nationally determined contributions under the Paris Agreement are nowhere near enough. We need legally binding targets and carbon pricing to close the...
Think individual action is pointless? Think again. Here's the blunt truth about climate policy, emissions, and what actually works.
We can still hit the 1.5°C target, but only if we triple renewables, double efficiency, and crack down on methane. Here's what's actually at stake and...
The Paris Agreement, despite its flaws, remains our most effective lever against climate change. Here's why we must double down on it.
Carbon pricing is booming, but it won't save us if we ignore methane. Here's why you need to push for methane cuts first, and how to do it.
Voluntary climate pledges are failing. It's time to make national climate action legally binding, just like the Montreal Protocol.